FREE THINKING:
EXPLORE THE REALMS OF KNOWLEDGE

The Paradox of Power: Surveillance, Rebellion, and the Illusion of Control 

​

Throughout political history, power has seldom operated as a neutral entity. It lures, corrupts, and transforms societies under the pretence of safety and advancement.

​

From ancient governments to contemporary technocratic systems, the quest for power frequently leads to instability rather than equilibrium, resulting in cycles of oppression and uprising.

​

Plato, in the 4th century BCE, cautioned against rushing into democracy, arguing that governance should develop through stages of civic maturity before the masses can govern effectively.

His wariness resonates today, as democratic institutions face challenges from surveillance capitalism and algorithm-driven governance. His statement—“until philosophers are kings… cities will never cease from their evils” (Republic, 473c)—serves as a powerful critique of our political ambitions.

​

In modern times, the growth of digital surveillance mirrors George Orwell’s foresight from 1949, where “Big Brother is watching you” shifted from a fictional dystopia to a stark reality.

Shoshana Zuboff’s work, “The Age of Surveillance Capitalism” (2019), reveals how data extraction has morphed into a new form of influence—opaque, unaccountable, and intricately woven into daily life.

​

She posits that “surveillance capitalism takes human experiences as free raw material, turning them into behavioural data.”

​

However, power isn’t confined to institutions; it plays out through connections, technologies, and ideologies. Michel Foucault’s idea of biopower (1976) redefined governance as the oversight of life itself, where authority is exerted not through visible oppression but through normalisation and regulation.

​

In this framework, even seemingly protective measures—like security cameras, biometric identification, and predictive policing—can act as tools of oppression.

​

Rebellion, therefore, is more than just a response to oppression; it reflects a reaction against the diminishing sense of autonomy.

​

Hannah Arendt, in her book “On Revolution” (1963), stated that “the most radical revolutionary will become a conservative the day after the revolution.” This cyclical nature of power suggests that the issue isn’t who has power, but how that power is organised and justified.

 

Ultimately, the paradox of power resides in its contradictory nature: it claims to protect while also aiming to control.

​

As societies confront the moral challenges of surveillance, governance, and resistance, the real question is not whether power can be restrained, but whether it can be redefined—not as a means to conquer, but as a collective force for justice, transparency, and shared growth.